[Bug 1515017] [NEW] Package removal from ocaml transition request
Launchpad Bug Tracker
1515017 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Nov 10 22:45:13 UTC 2015
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100):
The ocaml transition [1] for xenial is almost finished. There are a few
packages left uninstallable but those are either FTBFS for known reasons
or seem to be false-positives from the transition tracker.
* eliom: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802860
* matita: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802264
* cduce: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802268
* nurpawiki: depends on eliom
* mingw-ocaml: installs fine on amd64 and i386
* ocaml-fdkaac: installs fine on all currently buildable architectures: amd64, i386 and armhf - didn't build on any others before
* ocamlgsl: FTBFS against new gsl, unrelated to ocaml
* orpie: depends on ocamlgsl
* ben: FTBFS probably due to the new ocaml - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ben/+bug/1515019
* hhvm: FTBFS on current toolchain - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hhvm/+bug/1515026
There are also these:
* llvm-toolchain-3.4, llvm-toolchain-3.5, llvm-toolchain-3.6, llvm-
toolchain-3.7: rebuilt and seem to have installability problems for
other reasons
Reverse depends report follows.
Listing only existing reverse depends, all other packages do not have any build or binary reverse dependencies:
root at amatsu:/# reverse-depends -b src:eliom
Reverse-Build-Depends
=====================
* nurpawiki (for libeliom-ocaml-dev)
root at amatsu:/# reverse-depends -b src:ocamlgsl
Reverse-Build-Depends
=====================
* orpie (for libocamlgsl-ocaml-dev)
root at amatsu:/# reverse-depends src:matita
Reverse-Recommends
==================
* science-logic (for matita)
* science-mathematics (for matita)
[1] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
archive/transitions/html/ocaml.html
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: High
Status: New
--
Package removal from ocaml transition request
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515017
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators, which is subscribed to the bug report.
More information about the ubuntu-archive
mailing list