Rejecting nova-compute-lxd

[Martin Pitt]

Hey Chuck,

I reviewed nova-compute-lxd from the source NEW queue, and have to
reject it:

  * debian/copyright is missing several copyrights, from HP, Citrix,
    OpenStack Foundation, CloudScaling, and others. Also, a copyright
    year 2015 from Canonical. Check grep -ri '(c)'

  Hint: No need to repeat the same license several times, you can just
  say "License: Apache-2" n times, and at the bottom have a "License:
  Apache-2" block with the full text. (That's not a rejection issue,
  of course)

  * debian/control declares a python-nova.flex binary package which is
    already in the archive (built by nova-compute-flex). But it
    doesn't actually install any files into it, and it's also missing
    ${python:Depends}. Also, its XB-Python-Version: is wrong.

  * debian/python-nova.lxd.install doesn't match any binary that this
    source produces. Maybe the above should be renamed to
    python-nova.lxd? nova-compute-lxd wants to depend on it, so
    something should build that package.

  * package descriptions talk about "Flex" -- copy&paste leftover?

  * (not a rejection reason, but please clean up) Rename
    debian/install to debian/<package>.install for packages which
    produce multiple binaries.

  * Please bump standards version to 3.9.6.

Will this supersede nova-compute-flex, or is that yet something
different?

Note that I subscribed ubuntu-release to the FFE bug #1424029 so that
they actually have a chance to see it.

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)