[Bug 682644] Re: Sync ufw 0.30.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Bilal Akhtar bilalakhtar at ubuntu.com
Mon Nov 29 18:26:50 GMT 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/29/2010 06:32 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Sorry, I just came online from holiday. This hadn't been sync'd yet
> because the Debian package ships application profiles in

Really? But I know some packages in Debian which ship the ufw profile
(eg nginx in debian) .

> /etc/ufw/applications.d, whereas Ubuntu has traditionally shipped those
> in packages. While not a big issue, this sync means that there will be
> duplicate profiles for some applications. The Ubuntu deltas in the
> packages that ship an application profile should be checked and updated
> to no longer ship the profile if the ufw package now has a profile.

When I obtained the merged package from M-o-M (there were no conflicts),
and then checked the ubuntu delta, there was nothing, the debdiff only
contained the changelog delta. But now I understand why it happened;
because the Debian version -2 added the profiles.

But it could be fixed another way; Remove the profiles from the ufw
package in Ubuntu.

What do you say, Jamie?


- -- 
Bilal Akhtar - Ubuntu Developer, yet still 14 years old.
More information about him can be found on
https://edge.launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar
IRC nick: bilalakhtar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM8/BpAAoJENsMxwzgYeH2BWAIAJQAsQcqyv68dfZrijFnw8wn
9MTzlsWHJUt7nTVyJU9rDJQyfT/p3KYg4T5p1eWGjtdCy7cZ40UeTP3W3NGF+jlK
xTrHUXg/TUT2iuGtUuXY9+RZQhkmv2DOtZzPWu/VC5h/StDy+g4SlE9feYkSXskW
ZSavQ0QCQTgCf9qlksiQjhmWQ2q4JNxRGuFh8jvI+B0IpSAQGlin5O0BfkQajYT7
/HIL3LcMO5vCR0EyzoMvX5397ndkIhQ9OQvy7CAj50g6xFfxh/fxWaRalbx7T6k1
ahriOPPkMB3wKv22NDaj23aWcTzgB3oQuKo/8UGyJP7ZrwFHszOfKyC0PmlCtc0=
=v04/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Sync ufw 0.30.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682644
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Package Archive Administrators, which is a direct subscriber.



More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list