[Bug 538376] Re: [FFe] Sync xserver-xorg-input-joystick 1:1.5.0-2 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

Artur Rona ari-tczew at tlen.pl
Sun Mar 21 11:41:52 GMT 2010


** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-joystick
  
  Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
  1.5.0 uses udev to load the driver so no .fdi files are necessary.
  
+ Explanation why this is necessary for lucid? Because xserver-xorg-input-
+ joystick currently is broken and 1.5.0 version is needed for rebuild
+ with xserver 1.7.
  
- Explanation why this is necessary for lucid? Because xserver-xorg-input-joystick currently is broken and 1.5.0 version is needed for rebuild with xserver 1.7.
+ Features change since 1.4.1:
+ 
+ * Key configuration semantic changed:
+ Instead of supplying a KeySym, users need to configure scancodes, according to 
+ the selected keyboard layout (defaults to evdev, us). See man page for 
+ examples.
+ * Property support for configured scancodes

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-joystick
  
  Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
  1.5.0 uses udev to load the driver so no .fdi files are necessary.
  
  Explanation why this is necessary for lucid? Because xserver-xorg-input-
  joystick currently is broken and 1.5.0 version is needed for rebuild
  with xserver 1.7.
  
+ 
  Features change since 1.4.1:
  
  * Key configuration semantic changed:
- Instead of supplying a KeySym, users need to configure scancodes, according to 
- the selected keyboard layout (defaults to evdev, us). See man page for 
+ Instead of supplying a KeySym, users need to configure scancodes, according to
+ the selected keyboard layout (defaults to evdev, us). See man page for
  examples.
  * Property support for configured scancodes
+ http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg-announce@lists.freedesktop.org/msg00966.html

-- 
[FFe] Sync xserver-xorg-input-joystick 1:1.5.0-2 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538376
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Package Archive Administrators, which is a direct subscriber.



More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list