Zope packages

Gediminas Paulauskas menesis at pov.lt
Wed Feb 17 19:44:43 GMT 2010


2010/2/13 Jamie Strandboge <jamie at canonical.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathon Riddell and I had a different interpretation of 'should' with
> regard to the ZPL in your recent zope package uploads. You had uploaded
> the following packages with the same version:
>
> zope.annotation
> zope.broken
> zope.container
> zope.keyreference
> zope.lifecycleevent
>
> I ended up deNEWing the first uploads of these (ie without the ZPL)
> before I noticed Jonathon rejected them via email. I'm not sure why, but
> these weren't in the REJECT queue but still in NEW. Since the 2nd upload
> uses the same version as the 1st and I accepted the first, I had to
> reject the updated packages with the ZPL in them. I agree that it is
> better to have the ZPL included, and ask that you reupload the packages
> with the ZPL with with an incremented version. Sorry for the confusion.

Daniel Holbach has reuploaded them and they are now in the archive.



More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list