[Bug 522358] Re: [OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 2/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml transition from Debian sid to lucid

[Steve Langasek]

> As just written on irc, I agree that jocaml doesn't need a FFe (as I'd
> also like to see the ocaml transtion getting done asap).

I would caution here to distinguish between "doesn't need a FFe" and
"has been granted an FFe".  I can't tell from reading this bug log
whether you mean that the jocaml update doesn't include anything that's
affected by FF, or that all ocaml-related packages have a blanket
exception.  I don't think we want to do the latter without knowing what
kind of changes are included, or defining some limits on what's ok.

-- 
[OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 2/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml transition from Debian sid to lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Package Archive Administrators, which is a direct subscriber.