On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:32:32 +0000, James Westby <james.westby at canonical.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm afraid I have to reject lazr.enum. It has an LGPLv3+ licensed file > in the package, but this isn't mentioned in debian/copyright. I believe > it may actually be a mistake upstream. I'm rejecting again, is this is still the case. Thanks, James