Rejection of lazr.enum

[Scott Kitterman]

"Daniel Holbach" <daniel.holbach at canonical.com> wrote:

>On 10.04.2010 06:03, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Upstream tarballs are required to contain a full copy of the relevant 
>> license(s) so they are distributable without Debian packaging.  The uploaded 
>> package contained COPYING.txt, but it was part of the diff.gz and not the 
>> upstream tarball.
>
>As far as I know it's fine to let upstream know about it and in the
>meantime add the license as part of the .diff.gz. It's been common
>practise for other archive admins AFAICT.
>
Yes. We got that clarified and the package is in now (I reuploaded it).

Scott K