[Bug 355781] Re: [Source+binary removal] kdvi
vincenzo_ml at yahoo.it
Thu May 7 18:22:05 BST 2009
The last sentence is neither correct nor complete. It should read:
"In that case, I would prefer using evince because it reloads documents
much faster (and it matters in the specific case of latex). Of course,
installing _kdvi_ from intrepid ..."
BTW: as usual, don't get me wrong. E.g. okular is a good tool because it
allows for pdf annotations. In a scientific environment this is useful
for reviewing papers and I don't have doubts that people will like it a
lot. It is the specific use case of frequent document recompiling that
makes it the wrong tool in the jaunty (and possibly karmic) time window.
I do not have any doubt that it will replace kdvi completely in the
[Source+binary removal] kdvi
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Package Archive Administrators, which is a direct subscriber.
More information about the ubuntu-archive