[Bug 204959] Re: Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

[Scott Kitterman]

[00:04] <ScottK2> sistpoty: Would you please ack Bug 204959
[00:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 204959 in xapian-bindings "Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/204959
[00:05] <ScottK2> It builds which is better we have now.
[00:05] <persia> Isn't that version also required to match the current libxapian?
[00:06] <ScottK2> Yes
[00:07] <ScottK2> But it's a new upstream, so I want an ack.
[00:09] <sistpoty> ScottK2: there are two rdepends... did the API change?
[00:10] <sistpoty> (in an incompatible way)
[00:10] <-- xtknight has left this server (Remote closed the connection).
[00:10] * ScottK2 looks.
[00:10] --> LucidFox has joined this channel (n=sikon at wikia/Sikon).
[00:11] <-- santiago-ve has left this server ("<?php if(HAS_NOTHING_TO_DO){die();} ?>").
[00:13] --> gordon_ has joined this channel (n=gordon at cpe-76-183-178-59.tx.res.rr.com).
[00:13] <-- gordon_ has left this server (Client Quit).
[00:14] <ScottK2> sistpoty: From reading Changelog and NEWS, no.  Currently we have xapien-bindings and xapiend-core on different versions.  I think having them the same and having the bindings buildable is way better than whatever risk there is of bumping.
[00:16] <sistpoty> ScottK2: hm.. I don't see a xapiend-core?
[00:17] <ScottK2> It would help if I could spell 
[00:17] <ScottK2> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xapian-core
[00:18] <sistpoty> heh
[00:18] <-- gordon has left this server (Remote closed the connection).
[00:19] <sistpoty> yes, that makes sense to me, ACK'd
[00:19] <ScottK2> Thanks

** Changed in: xapian-bindings (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204959
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Package Archive Administrators, which is a direct subscriber.