rejecting sugar packages

Jani Monoses jani at ubuntu.com
Tue Feb 5 16:56:41 GMT 2008


FWIW hulahop and sugar-base were accepted today without that -ubuntuX
requirement.


On Feb 5, 2008 6:54 PM, Jani Monoses <jani at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The version numbers of these packages change so fast upstream that it
> would have been
> no gain  at this point to add those since Debian is not yet working on
> these (I was planning on notifying
> them to pick our packages as soon as they're in the archive)
>
> Please could you reconsider the rejection, and if you think it is
> important to have ubuntuX versions I'll
> add them ASAP in subsequent uploads which will no doubt happen soon as I
> keep the pace with upstream.
>
> thanks
> Jani
>
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 6:51 PM, Jonathan Riddell <jriddell at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm rejecting the sugar packages in New because they don't have
> > -0ubuntuX version numbers.
> >
> > Rejecting sugar-web-activity
> > Rejecting sugar-journal-activity
> > Rejecting sugar-chat-activity
> > Rejecting sugar-pippy-activity
> > Rejecting sugar-artwork
> > Rejecting sugar-memorize-activity
> > Rejecting sugar-calculate-activity
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/attachments/20080205/ca7dc053/attachment.htm 


More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list