[archive at ubuntu.com: Accepted: activeldap (source)]

Matt Zimmerman mdz at canonical.com
Sun Nov 4 16:25:47 GMT 2007

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 05:09:21PM -0200, Celso Providelo wrote:
> On 11/3/07, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at canonical.com> wrote:
> > These came through to hardy-changes, but look like automatic syncs (which
> > usually go to -changes-auto).  Did something change?
> Hi Matt,
> Code was broken recently. I've just checked the relevant section and it says:
> {{{
>    # Fallback, all the rest coming from insecure, secure and sync
>    # policies should send an acceptance and an announcement message.
> }}}
> Clearly 'sync' should not send announcements to -changes@ as the comments says.
> We will get a fix (and a test) for it as per
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/159799
> Just a quick question, how many announcement lists we have attached to
> each distroseries ?
> Currently we only store a 'changeslist' for each distroseries, but
> your comment suggests we should store others or adopt a proper pattern
> like:
>  1.  changes_list:      <NAME>-changes@
>  2.  auto_changes_list: <NAME>-changes-auto@
>  ...
> Can you describe other cases ?

That's all we have at present.  In fact, I think we can simplify further, as
changes for the current development release should really go to a single
list (e.g. ubuntu-changes@) rather than <NAME>-changes (which means that
developers need to resubscribe every time a new release opens).

 - mdz

More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list