gimmie rejected

[Daniel Holbach]

Hello Tollef,

thanks for taking the time to review the package.

On Di, 2007-01-30 at 11:18 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I've just rejected your gimmie upload because of an incorrect 
> debian/copyright as well as missing full texts for licences in the 
> source package:

Do you still have a copy of the packaging around? I must have
accidentally deleted it and I couldn't find it on Launchpad.


> ltihooks.py is GPL-ed, but no copy of the GPL is in the orig.tar.gz, nor 
> is it referenced in debian/copyright.  Same goes for the .c files in 
> gdmclient/
> 
> W3CDate.py is Python licenced, but no reference in debian/copyright, nor 
> a copy of the full licence.

I'll talk to upstream about these two.


> Also, it seems like gimmie uses an embedded copy of libsexy, could it 
> rather use the copy in the archive?

I'll take a look at it and talk to upstream too.

Thanks again. Have a nice day,
 Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/attachments/20070206/6c56d324/attachment.pgp