daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com
Tue Feb 6 09:17:03 GMT 2007
thanks for taking the time to review the package.
On Di, 2007-01-30 at 11:18 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I've just rejected your gimmie upload because of an incorrect
> debian/copyright as well as missing full texts for licences in the
> source package:
Do you still have a copy of the packaging around? I must have
accidentally deleted it and I couldn't find it on Launchpad.
> ltihooks.py is GPL-ed, but no copy of the GPL is in the orig.tar.gz, nor
> is it referenced in debian/copyright. Same goes for the .c files in
> W3CDate.py is Python licenced, but no reference in debian/copyright, nor
> a copy of the full licence.
I'll talk to upstream about these two.
> Also, it seems like gimmie uses an embedded copy of libsexy, could it
> rather use the copy in the archive?
I'll take a look at it and talk to upstream too.
Thanks again. Have a nice day,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/attachments/20070206/6c56d324/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-archive