http://mgjuddltd.co.uk compliance,

[Phillip Whiteside]

Hi,

They're taking the urine now.

  <a class = 'N' title='M.G. Judd Part Number' href='display_part.php?PID=218'>
  68                 OL/OP007/1
  68               </a>
  68             </td>
  69             <td>
  69 [image: next problem] <#p2>[image: previous problem] <#p0>E836
<#E836> [WCAG v1 13.1 (AA)] Use different values for 'title'
attributes with links that use the same link text:
                   <a class = 'N' title='Original Equipment
Manufacturers Part Number' href='display_part.php?PID=218'>
  69                 -
  69               </a>

Ermm. , and they have two different 'title' tags? the link text is different
per item WTF?


Confused @ phill

Regards,

Phill.

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Bob Trevithick
<bob.trevithick at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> All I see so far is the issue with using the same text to link to
> different places.  Try running tv on:
>
>
> http://mgjuddltd.co.uk/search.php?LookFor=chain&MyImpSize=NULL&MyMetSize=NULL
>
> Is there a page in particular that we should look at?  I just did that
> search at random.
>
> Best,
> Bob
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Phillip Whiteside
> <PhillW at uk.vpolink.com> wrote:
> > Hi Kenny, Alex & Bob,
> > firstly, thank you for helping me on this one. I have re-written the site
> in
> > terms of headers etc. along with changes to table descriptions / column
> > descriptions. I have made so many changes that I ask if you would have a
> > good check on the site and check that it is usable, in the "find parts"
> > think of 'oil', 'spanner', 'filter' etc.
> > I'm up to http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=16289 ::sigh::
> at
> > negative comments :-(
> > Hi Mailing list,
> > I'm dipping my toe back into the mailing list, after the last time went
> bad.
> > If any of you have chance, please have a look.
> > I'd also appreciate any views on whether I should code to WCAG version 1
> or
> > version 2 ?
> > Has any one has worked out the answer to 'until' from
> > the http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#tech-divide-links where the
> word
> > 'until' has its own entry as I use a programming routine that seems to
> work
> > fine with readers, yet am told "until" the readers can handle them, i am
> not
> > allowed to?
> > I know that there is still a lot of for me to learn on the difference
> > between a robot site saying it is okay and someone with using a screen
> > reader, or any other accessibility access (Do shout now, while I am
> > learning), I ask this time that only those who will give
> > constructive criticism reply. I do need people who will do the manual
> > testing against what the robots reply.
> > Regards,
> > Phill.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-accessibility/attachments/20100623/10b55477/attachment.htm