http://mgjuddltd.co.uk compliance,

[Bob Trevithick]

There is one URL you are going to: href='display_part.php?PID=218'

But there are multiple descriptions (titles) of that URL.  In one
case, you call it title='M.G. Judd Part Number' but in another case
you call it title='Original Equipment Manufacturers Part Number'.

It's the same URL, but you're potentially confusing the reader by
giving it two different names.  I think that's what they're getting
at.  Make scents? :)

Bob

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Phillip Whiteside
<PhillW at uk.vpolink.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> They're taking the urine now.
>
>   <a class = 'N' title='M.G. Judd Part Number' href='display_part.php?PID=218'>
>   68                 OL/OP007/1
>   68               </a>
>   68             </td>
>   69             <td>
>   69 E836 [WCAG v1 13.1 (AA)] Use different values for 'title' attributes with links that use the same link text:
>                    <a class = 'N' title='Original Equipment Manufacturers Part Number' href='display_part.php?PID=218'>
>   69                 -
>   69               </a>
>
> Ermm. , and they have two different 'title' tags? the link text is different per item WTF?
>
> Confused @ phill
> Regards,
> Phill.
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Bob Trevithick <bob.trevithick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> All I see so far is the issue with using the same text to link to
>> different places.  Try running tv on:
>>
>> http://mgjuddltd.co.uk/search.php?LookFor=chain&MyImpSize=NULL&MyMetSize=NULL
>>
>> Is there a page in particular that we should look at?  I just did that
>> search at random.
>>
>> Best,
>> Bob
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Phillip Whiteside
>> <PhillW at uk.vpolink.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Kenny, Alex & Bob,
>> > firstly, thank you for helping me on this one. I have re-written the site in
>> > terms of headers etc. along with changes to table descriptions / column
>> > descriptions. I have made so many changes that I ask if you would have a
>> > good check on the site and check that it is usable, in the "find parts"
>> > think of 'oil', 'spanner', 'filter' etc.
>> > I'm up to http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=16289 ::sigh:: at
>> > negative comments :-(
>> > Hi Mailing list,
>> > I'm dipping my toe back into the mailing list, after the last time went bad.
>> > If any of you have chance, please have a look.
>> > I'd also appreciate any views on whether I should code to WCAG version 1 or
>> > version 2 ?
>> > Has any one has worked out the answer to 'until' from
>> > the http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#tech-divide-links where the word
>> > 'until' has its own entry as I use a programming routine that seems to work
>> > fine with readers, yet am told "until" the readers can handle them, i am not
>> > allowed to?
>> > I know that there is still a lot of for me to learn on the difference
>> > between a robot site saying it is okay and someone with using a screen
>> > reader, or any other accessibility access (Do shout now, while I am
>> > learning), I ask this time that only those who will give
>> > constructive criticism reply. I do need people who will do the manual
>> > testing against what the robots reply.
>> > Regards,
>> > Phill.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>