Provisional MicroReleaseExceptions review

[Martin Pitt]

Brian Murray [2014-05-14  7:32 -0700]:
> I don't think iscsitarget should have been moved away from provisional
> since we had only a month's worth of data and it was not included in the
> provisional status report.

Indeed, that wasn't intended. Thanks for pointing out!

> Additionally, it would be useful if when packages were added to the
> provisional section we also added a date for reviewing their
> provisional status using the same tool.

Sounds good. Both done in

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions?action=diff&rev2=49&rev1=48

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20140514/aaf1a5e8/attachment.pgp>