Readjusting SRU review process

[Brian Murray]

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:48:02PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:19:14PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Brian Murray [2013-05-24  8:00 -0700]:
> > > 
> > > Having said that, I currently don't reject things because there is not a
> > > good way to communicate the reason for rejection to the uploader.
> > 
> > Why is following up in the bug not a good way?
> 
> Following up in bugs is fine for SRUs, since they're all meant to be
> tied to bugs anyway.  This isn't true for, say, things in the NEW
> queue, however.
> 
> And, even in the SRU case, you might have an SRU that addresses 24
> bugs: which one do you follow up on?  All 24?  The first in the list?
> The one that seems most relevant to the problem you found with the
> upload?
> 
> At any rate, I'm having StevenK work on getting Soyuz to allow for
> a rejection comment, and from there, we can let the debate drop, since
> we'll be able to do rejection comments or, if you prefer, you can
> follow up to a bug, and have the rejection comment be:
> 
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foo/+bug/1234/comments/5

Great, thanks for getting that worked on.  I'm watching the bug and will
update the sru-review tool when the feature is available.

--
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20130528/c30a7a60/attachment.pgp>