Readjusting SRU review process

[Brian Murray]

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:30:30PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:18:01PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > 
> > It seems the regular reviewing days got dropped some time ago.
> 
> This is, in essence, the only real problem we have.  We set up this
> lovely rotation, and then one of us gets busy for a few weeks, gets
> out of the habit, and it snowballs.  This is true of every member
> of the team, I think, so I won't bother pointing fingers.
> 
> We have just recruited a bit of fresh blood (hi, Stephane), which
> will help a tad, and once he's up to speed, we'll give him his own
> rotation day, but the rest of us surely can and should pull up our
> socks and get back on track.
> 
> Another thing to note was that we were going to rewrite some of
> our tools to make the review process less crap (and, thus, make it
> slightly less un-fun to dive in to the queue for a few hours), but
> I believe that got stalled/trumped by other things.  I'll chase
> that up too.

I've submitted a merge proposal that improves the review process,
although it doesn't handle the case of rejecting uploads and sending
people mail.

Given that Launchpad API doesn't expose a way to contact users, what
would be the best way of sending the uploader of a package being
rejected email?

--
Brian Murray
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20130523/d8524d39/attachment.pgp>