Readjusting SRU review process

[Martin Pitt]

Brian Murray [2013-05-16 15:19 -0700]:
> I'm not sure the length of the queue is actually indicative of what
> needs to be reviewed as we tend to ask people to add missing
> information, e.g. Regression Potential, to the bug description rather
> than rejecting the upload.

That was also my first thought. That's true for some uploads, but I
actually went through the queue and associated bugs, and the majority
of old ones didn't have any action on the bugs yet.

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20130517/3840a12f/attachment.pgp>