Brainstorm review: Check the ink level of printers

Martin Pitt martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Tue Dec 11 07:38:45 UTC 2012


Hello Till,

Once you've read the details below, please respond with an
acknowledgement and let me know if you can participate.  The expected
time investment should be about an hour over the next two weeks.

The Ubuntu Technical Board has a regular program to respond to top voted
topics on Ubuntu Brainstorm:

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard/BrainstormReview

The current review cycle is being tracked at

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard/BrainstormReview/Dec2012

Our goal is to improve our responsiveness to the questions, concerns
and suggestions we receive from the user community.  Note that this
does NOT mean that we will commit to following the suggestions, but we
will evaluate and respond to them.  By explaining what we will (or
won't) do and why, we will show that we are paying attention and
trying to make good decisions on behalf of our users.

The way the program works is that the Technical Board identifies
people within the Ubuntu project who are knowledgeable in the specific
topics proposed in Brainstorm, and asks each of them to write a short
response to one topic.

One of the most popular topics in brainstorm at present is about
checking the ink level of printers in Ubuntu:

  http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/30099

Since you are well versed in this area, we would appreciate if you could
spend a short time reading the Brainstorm content about it and writing a
few paragraphs.  You don't need to have all the answers, and I encourage
you to ask for input from others who might have a view on the issue.
This can be in the form of a detailed upstream bug report, a blog post,
an email, or any other suitable format.  It shouldn't take more than an
hour or two to complete.

Our goal is to have everything ready for publication by mid-January
2013. Can you confirm that you're willing and able to help with this?

You can formulate your response as you see fit, but make sure that the
tone is sympathetic.  Many of the comments in Brainstorm take the form
of demands or complaints: just treat these as if they were questions,
and answer them politely.  Try to listen to the *need* behind the
suggestion, not just the suggestion itself, and connect with your
audience by telling a story about it.

Here are some example formulas which might be helpful to you:

 * "It sounds like the problem described here is X.  We address that in
   Ubuntu today by doing A, B and C.  Maybe that's not working for
   everyone because of Y.  We could improve this by doing Z."

 * "I would love to see a new feature like that in Ubuntu.  It's
   consistent with the way other parts of Ubuntu work, and seems
   genuinely useful.  We're busy with some higher priority projects at
   the moment like X, but if someone is interested in writing a patch
   for this, I will help them get it into Ubuntu and upstream."

 * "This is a really hard problem without an easy solution.  It's
   complex because of X, Y and Z.  It will take some time for this to be
   completely solved, but here are a few projects we're working on which
   will make things better, bit by bit."

 * "That's an easy fix.  I've written a patch and uploaded it to
   Oneiric.  It will be in the 11.10 release!"

 * "That's a great idea, and we already thought of it!  Here's the
   blueprint, and here's how you can follow along as this gets
   implemented in Natty."

 * "I passed on your suggestion to the upstream developer of the
   software, and we had a conversation about it.  Here's what we
   decided."

 * "This seems like a genuine problem, but I'm not sure that's the right
   solution, because of X and Y.  I asked our usability expert Jill
   about this, and here's what she suggested."

 * "I didn't understand what the problem was here, so I had a
   conversation on IRC with Jamie, who submitted this topic to
   Brainstorm to understand better.  Here's how it went:

   [...]

   In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."

If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.

Thank you in advance!

Martin Pitt
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20121211/30d436a9/attachment.pgp>


More information about the technical-board mailing list