Policy proposal for partner repository

[Martin Pitt]

Hello Nicolas, hello TB,

unfortunately we didn't get quorum in today's meeting, so let's vote
this on via email.

Nicolas Barcet [2011-06-06 16:27 +0200]:
> I have made a first pass at this and updated the proposed policy
> wiki page accordingly. As the goal of the proposal is to recommend
> using the Ubuntu policy for most areas but not block a package from
> being published unless one of the explicit rules is broken, I have
> linked to it as a "should" and listed sections where deviation is
> explicitly granted. 

I like that it is expressed in terms of a delta to the standard Ubuntu
policy, although this makes it a little harder to use as a
documentation for archive admins; but as the gist of it is quite easy
to get used to (allow /opt and library crazyness, and basically ignore
copyright and license), I don't see this as a major problem.

This looks good to me, +1 from me. It's a nice refinement from the
original document you sent around earlier. 

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20110616/d97b9287/attachment.pgp>