connman [was: Re: Proposal to Release Ubuntu 10.10 on 10.10.10]

Sebastien Bacher seb128 at ubuntu.com
Tue May 11 15:40:48 BST 2010


Le mardi 11 mai 2010 à 11:40 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> I think it's a great idea to start looking at connman now and taking
> it as a potential NM replacement (across the board) once it's on par
> with NM with the features of NM. I don't think it's a good idea to
> committing to using it in Maverick even before we have run a
> large-scale test with it. 

I agree with that, connman has still a long way to go and one cycle
seems short to get in shape. Having network access working correctly is
especially important on UNE since it's the main use of most netbooks, it
would be a drawback for Ubuntu to have the first unity version being
associated with non working internet experience. 
It's nice to have a fallback option but it would still provide a
suboptimal unity experience where it seems we could aim for something
much better using the technologies we have now.

Sebastien Bacher





More information about the technical-board mailing list