[gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel] [PATCH] dynload for libfaac

[Reinhard Tartler]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:42:41 (CET), Mark Shuttleworth wrote:

> On 02/03/10 17:21, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I also have a good relationship with ffmpeg upstream (in fact, I
>> recently joined them for helping out with release management), but
>> this particular disagreement did make me raise concerns about the
>> libfaac package in general and the libavcodec-unstripped-51 package in
>> jaunty in particular.
>
> Is there any bad blood between the projects, beyond the question of
> licensing?

not that I would be aware of. They seem to be generally annoyed by the
way how faac upstream treats copyrights and licenses. The most recent
analysis seems to be this one:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/103514

I don't have much experience myself with faac upstream, other than he
seems to ignore me when I forwarded him this issue:

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/faac/+bug/374900

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4