armel in lucid: supported architectures vs. ports
mdz at canonical.com
Tue Feb 2 10:50:42 GMT 2010
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:27:12PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:19:13PM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> > Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> writes:
> > > Are the semantics of ports.ubuntu.com documented anywhere? As far as
> > > I'm aware, the primary purpose of the "ports" separation is to keep
> > > mirror size manageable.
> > I believe Colin's working up a more through reply to this, but
> > basically: yes.
> I've edited https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive,
> which used to contradict the statement above. Could you please review
> it for correctness and clarity?
Looks good to me, thanks Colin.
More information about the technical-board