armel in lucid: supported architectures vs. ports

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:27:12PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:19:13PM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> > Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> writes:
> > > Are the semantics of ports.ubuntu.com documented anywhere?  As far as
> > > I'm aware, the primary purpose of the "ports" separation is to keep
> > > mirror size manageable.
> > 
> > I believe Colin's working up a more through reply to this, but
> > basically: yes.
> 
> I've edited https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive,
> which used to contradict the statement above.  Could you please review
> it for correctness and clarity?
> 
>   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Architectures
>   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Installation%20Media

Looks good to me, thanks Colin.

-- 
 - mdz