Debian Position On The Tech Board

[Bdale Garbee]

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:38:20 -0700, Jono Bacon <jono at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 22:31 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I certainly continue to be in favour of there being a Debian
> > representative on the TB, and it's worth us remembering to explicitly
> > involve that representative when it's relevant.  So far, my perspective
> > is that Bdale's presence has been helpful and sufficient in cases where
> > it's been relevant so far, and so I'm not sure there's a problem to
> > solve here right now.  Do you have a specific concern, or is it just a
> > checklist item?
> 
> Merely a checklist; I had not seen any conversations involving Bdale, so
> I just wanted to check I was on the same page, and I can communicate
> this back to Stefano. :-)

FWIW, I'm reading this thread from LinuxCon... I do follow the various
discussions, but nothing in recent threads has been of particular
relevance to Debian. 

Bdale
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20100810/3e85def4/attachment.pgp