Updating SRU exception for hal-info

[Scott James Remnant]

On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:03 -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:

> We don't restrict SRUs of any other packages out of concern that the
> toolchain will be broken, and the SRU exception for hal-info (and
> subsequently udev) doesn't wave the requirement of regression-testing and a
> waiting period.  Surely splitting the keymaps back out would be an
> artificial and cumbersome separation, and sets a /more/ strict standard than
> for our other SRUs?
> 
Most other packages don't break boot in quite so critical and
difficult-to-fix ways when they break? :-)

It's only a concern not a blocker though

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20100802/498d1811/attachment.pgp