[storm] Cache for nonexistent result

Ivan Zakrevskyi ivan.zakrevskyi at rebelmouse.com
Sat Jan 17 18:13:45 UTC 2015


You are right, @Free. It's not serializable, but it's not 100% safe for
repeatable read (repeatable level can lock only existent row). So, minimal
100% safe level is serializable.

I agree, that best place for nonexistent_cache is application extension,
not library, because it can't be 100% safe for repeatable read.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/storm/attachments/20150117/750b9185/attachment.html>


More information about the storm mailing list