[storm] Type checking

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 16:27, Gerdus van Zyl <gerdusvanzyl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Last time I brought up adding meta data (e.g. field size) and
> validation based on that the answer was basically that the core devs
> don't like it because of philosophical differences as in meta data
> belongs in the database and type conversion is not the job of Storm,
> etc. Which is a valid way of looking at things but isn't what most
> users outside canonical want. But still storm is the best orm i have
> tried :-)

This reflects poorly the discussions that already happened in this
list.  Please look at the archive for a better view on what was
actually presented.

-- 
Gustavo Niemeyer
http://niemeyer.net