[storm] question about strategy

[shawn bright]

so should i do a store.flush() at the end of each thread loop?

shawn

On 7/17/07, shawn bright <nephish at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, they all run independent of each other, in fact, if one dies, the
> others keep on running.
> The only thing they share is some of the text views in the GTK GUI that
> they update with new info
> as they run. They do not talk to each other at all.
>
> thanks
>
> On 7/17/07, Christopher Armstrong <radix at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/17/07, shawn bright <nephish at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > To process everything coming in and all control going out, we are
> > running
> > > about 16 threads, all initiated from the GUI.
> >
> > Does each thread want to do its own isolated transactions?
> >
> > > I am wondering what the best strategy would be for creating store
> > objects.
> > ...
> > > i know thats a lot, but i say that to ask this:
> > > what would be the best strategy for where to put my store?
> > > should i have several ? Like one per thread ?
> > > or should there be only one that i pass to each thread from the GUI as
> > > required?
> >
> > I imagine you want one Store per thread that wants to do database
> > work, assuming that the database work is isolated into a transaction.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christopher Armstrong
> > International Man of Twistery
> > http://radix.twistedmatrix.com/
> > http://twistedmatrix.com/
> > http://canonical.com/
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/storm/attachments/20070717/356fb9c8/attachment.htm