<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Want to start a fight in Linux desktop circles? Say, loudly and
obnoxiously that <a href="http://qt.nokia.com/">Qt</a>, the
programming libraries behind the <a href="http://www.kde.org/">KDE</a>
desktop, are better than <a href="http://www.gtk.org">GTK+</a>, the
libraries backing <a href="http://www.gnome.org">GNOME</a>. Or,
vice-versa. Either will work. Now, though, Mark Shuttleworth,
founder of <a href="http://www.canonical.com">Canonical</a>, <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu</a>’s corporate big brother,
is <a href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/568">bringing
Qt software to Ubuntu</a>, long a GNOME stronghold.
<p>So far I haven’t heard any shouting from the programmers’ corner,
but give it a minute.</p>
<p>Shuttleworth made the announcement writing, “As part of our
planning for Natty+1 [Ubuntu 11.10], we’ll need to find some space
on the CD for Qt libraries, and we will evaluate applications
developed with Qt for inclusion on the CD and default install of
Ubuntu.”<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/canonical-and-shuttleworth-add-qt-to-ubuntu-linux/8102">http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/canonical-and-shuttleworth-add-qt-to-ubuntu-linux/8102</a><br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
"To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge."
Confucius
</pre>
</body>
</html>