<font size="2"><font face="trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Kevin Hunter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hunteke@earlham.edu">hunteke@earlham.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">At 3:06am -0500 Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Gryllida wrote:<br>
> I have only one partition. Windows XP currently boots from it. I<br>
> don't know where I can install Ubuntu... Maybe I could shrink the<br>
> existing partition, but that's quite dangerous - will XP boot<br>
> from it again then?<br>
<br>
</div>Let me suggest virtualization as the possible better route. Reasoning:<br>
<br>
1. You've suggested that you're much more comfortable with Windows. If<br>
you're interested to learn Linux, virtualization is one very harmless<br>
way to check it out.<br>
<br>
2. You won't need to do any partition management. The only thing you'll<br>
have to do is create a large file, say 10G for starters. This large<br>
file would be the "hard drive" of the virtual computer, and you would<br>
create it with the GUI tools available through the virtualization<br>
solution. This is safer, because contrary to David's experience, I have<br>
definitely encountered instances (2 in the last month) where there were<br>
issues with the existing partition such that the Ubuntu installer didn't<br>
play nice<br>
<br>
3. If you decide you don't like it, it's as simple as clicking a delete<br>
button in a GUI, and you get all your disk space back. Juxtapose that<br>
experience with having to repartition everything again.<br>
<br>
4. You can run both systems simultaneously. It sounds like you live<br>
most of your life in Windows, and trying to convert too quickly might<br>
cause you headache. Besides, if you're doing web development, you need<br>
to see the rendering capabilities of multiple browsers. Having to<br>
reboot to windows every so often just to check the rendering of a web<br>
page would get tedious fast.<br>
<br>
5. Virtualization tools are free and Free. VirtualBox is my current<br>
favorite general-purpose virtualization solution because it's super<br>
fast, "just works", is easy to install on almost every platform<br>
(including Windows), and is GPL to boot. (Side note: VirtualBox is the<br>
*much* bigger loss than MySQL in this Oracle buyout of Sun. Much bigger.)<br>
<br>
6. If you understand the concept that a virtual computer means<br>
"virtualizating /everything/ for the 'guest' computer", then learning<br>
the VirtualBox GUI should take you no more than 30 minutes. It's very<br>
easy, and has wizards for a large portion of what it does. Further,<br>
it's help documentation is surprisingly well-written.<br>
<br>
Reasons not to go the virtualization route:<br>
<br>
- You don't have enough RAM. Remember that you're virtualizing a<br>
computer, and it will need RAM, just like a physical machine. So you'd<br>
need devote at least 512M of RAM to a guest Ubuntu while it was running.<br>
If you don't have the ram to spare, virtualization might not be a<br>
solution.<br>
<br>
- You don't have the virtualization hardware support available on your<br>
processor or enabled in your BIOS. I don't actually know how to check<br>
for this with Windows, but on Linux, you would do:<br>
<br>
$ grep -Ei "vmx|svm" /proc/cpuinfo<br>
<br>
If that returns any data in your flags line, you have the capability.<br>
You might have to enable it in the BIOS, but at least you know you have it.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Kevin<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
sounder mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sounder@lists.ubuntu.com">sounder@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>no, I want Ubuntu be independent of Windows. Thanks again for this suggestion.<br>