Indeed; much the same argument could be made about the sword* packages ("Matthew Henry's commentary on the whole bible").  Basically, so long as none of these are installed by default on your system, its not doing you harm any more than there are websites which you might like, but you're not forced to read them.  Meanwhile, there are people who would be interested in these (for anarchism, e.g. maybe students who only have good network access at their school and want to download the package to read offline later as part of a project on politics... I imagine one certainly wouldn't object to someone installing gchempaint to use at home for a project for a science class :) CK <div>On 2/9/07, chombee <<a href="mailto:chombee@nerdshack.com">chombee@nerdshack.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I think that to remove this package you need a better reason than the mere fact that it deals with anarchism. As has been said, there are all sorts of odd packages in Debian/Ubuntu that people might object to for all sorts of reasons. On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:15 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Michael T. Richter wrote: > > Uncompressed Size: 11.9M > > Suggests: www-browser > > Description: An exhaustive exploration of Anarchist theory and practice > >  The Anarchist FAQ is an excellent source of information regarding Anarchist (libertarian socialist) theory and practice. It covers all major topics, from the basics of Anarchism to very specific discussions of politics, social > >  organization, and economics. > > Sorry! Somehow the Universe repository was not enabled on this machine > (I was convinced it was). > > I think what you can do is, to contact the MOTU team and ask if there is > a route to remove the program from the archives, otherwise you might > have to schedule it as a topic at an Ubuntu Council meeting. Even though > the content may be harmful, there are consequences to removing it, some > might see it as censorship, but I think the Ubuntu project can way it > up, and to me it doesn't seem unreasonable to remove it, since I would > imagine that a lot of the content of that documentation would go against > the Ubuntu CoC. > > -Jonathan > > -- sounder mailing list <a href="mailto:sounder@lists.ubuntu.com">sounder@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder</a> </blockquote></div>