On 01/11/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matt Zimmerman</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:56:27AM +1100, Alexander Jacob Tsykin wrote:<br>> On Monday 30 October 2006 03:51, Matthew East wrote:<br>> > * Daniel Robitaille:<br>> > > The negative stories and blogs about Edgy are
<br>> > > starting to pile up:<br>> ><br>> > As with the last release cycle, people *expect* "apt-get dist-upgrade"<br>> > to work, and are losing their systems when they try. The negative
<br>> > implications of not supporting upgrades via apt-get are starting to hit<br>> > Ubuntu really hard in terms of reputation.<br>> ><br>> Judging by the upgrade nots at <a href="http://help.ubuntu.com">
help.ubuntu.com</a>,  they are righ and shodl<br>> expect the dist-upgrade to work. It's one of the recommended methods.<br>><br>> Sasha<br>><br>>  <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EdgyUpgrades">
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EdgyUpgrades</a><br><br>That page does warn of problems when using this method. I've updated it to<br>make the language even stronger.</blockquote><div><br>What would the _recomended_ method of updating a dapper server to edgy be? update-manage is an X program is it not?