Appropriate vs. unacceptable behaviour - Dead List Walking

[Samuel Thurston]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Paul Sladen <ubuntu at paul.sladen.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Liam Proven wrote:
>> Thanks a ******* lot, [named individual], you ****** ******* *******.
>
> QED.
>
>        -Paul
>
> PS.  http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct  The ambiguity behind
> those asterisks is completely unacceptable and undesired.  Thank you.

Ah, but if you are in [Named Individual]'s camp and support the
closure of the list, you could put happy words back there!  think of
it as "Mad Libs":

> Thanks a *tremendous* lot, [named individual], you *fine* *human* *being*.


It's not our fault you have a dirty mind. :)