Time to bite the Lucid bullet!
kassube at gmx.net
Sat Sep 18 08:32:18 BST 2010
Samuel Thurston wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Nils Kassube <kassube at gmx.net>
> > IMHO it was long known that Kubuntu Hardy wasn't LTS and therefore
> > I would not expect a direct upgrade Hardy -> Lucid to work. But
> > what happens if people have a Hardy system with both Gnome and
> > KDE? Would that also be "whacky"?
> Lets face facts, any upgrade has its potential pitfalls. The more
> customizations one has done to a system means more possibilities for
> conflicts and other difficulties along the way.
That's right, but installing both ubuntu-desktop and kubuntu-desktop on
a machine isn't a huge amount of customization IMHO. In this special
case the pitfall for the user is that the Hardy system was LTS for the
Gnome part and simultaneously non-LTS for the KDE part. I was just
wondering what the upgrade process should / would do in this case.
> But that
> avoids the question of why one would want two complete desktop
> environments on one system in the first place.
Example: Two people using the same machine and they can't agree on a
More information about the sounder