Oh......now this could be fun to watch! ;)

[Amedee Van Gasse]

On 27-06-10 12:32, David Gerard wrote:
> On 27 June 2010 11:27, Amedee Van Gasse<amedee-ubuntu at amedee.be>  wrote:
>> On 27-06-10 00:47, David Gerard wrote:
>
>>> A "birther" claiming not to be a racist is as credible as a "white
>>> nationalist" claiming not to be a Nazi.
>
>> I protest.
>> There is nothing wrong with nationalism, on the contrary look at
>> Catalonia, Flanders, Scotland,... all fine examples of regions with a
>> democratic nationalism. Also all of them regions with>90% "white"
>> population.
>
>
> Yet the phrase "white nationalist", when you put both words together
> and use them in English, is in practice synonymous with "neo-Nazi".

Could be, but this is not an American list. This is an international 
list that just happens to use some form of Pidgin English as lingua 
franca. "white" means caucasian and "nationalism" means the 
identification of a group with a political entity, so a "white 
nationalist" is a person of caucasian "race" (sic) who identifies with 
his own caucasian sub-group. Although modern nationalists now define 
themselves in terms of language and culture, not in terms of genome.

In terms of modern nationalism, an American is defined as everybody who 
lives on the left side of the pond, speaks English (but not the 
queen's), and survives on a diet of McDo (causing obesitas).
There, a cookie of your own dough.

For what it's worth, I'm feeding this entire thread to SpamBayes. I'm 
hoping that it will learn.