Linux infection proves Windows malware monopoly is over

[Erik Pomerantz]

Every Operating System gets malware, there is no question about that. Any
operating system designed just takes a little studying of how it works and
even less coding. The difference between Linux and Windows is that Linux
gets CONSIDERABLY less (almost irrelevantly less imho). The obscurity of
linux can also prove how secure it is, it is not all bad not being too
popular.

On Jun 15, 2010 12:50 AM, "Fred A. Miller" <fmiller at lightlink.com> wrote:

 Linux infection proves Windows malware monopoly is
over<http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=549550802-f09aff1f3240c763b781087d83996fa3-bf&brand=ZDNET&s=5>

Every time I write about Windows security software, I get a predictable
flood of responses from Linux advocates who claim that they don't need any
such protection.

READ FULL STORY<http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=549550803-f09aff1f3240c763b781087d83996fa3-bf&brand=ZDNET&s=5>

--
sounder mailing list
sounder at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20100615/78ea5b8e/attachment-0001.htm