Miguel de Icaza, Microsoft MVP
atheoi at gmail.com
Fri Jan 15 10:22:40 GMT 2010
Microsoft names ex-rival 'MVP'
Todd Bishop on Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 8:16am PST
Miguel de Icaza, Microsoft MVP?
Yep, it's true. The open-source rabble-rouser who was prevented from
hosting a session inside Microsoft's 2005 Professional Developer
Conference has been accepted into the ranks of the company's "Most
Valuable Professionals" less than five years later. He announced the
news on his blog.
De Icaza is the leader of the open-source Mono project, sponsored by
Novell, which previously set off alarm bells inside Microsoft for its
ability to expand Microsoft .NET applications to other platforms,
including Linux. Relations between de Icaza and Microsoft have warmed
following the Redmond company's partnership with Novell.
He's also on the board of the Microsoft-supported CodePlex Foundation,
Meanwhile, Mono spin-off project Moonlight, an open-source
implementation of Microsoft's Silverlight interactive technology, has
won the blessings of the Redmond company.
De Icaza was accepted as a Microsoft MVP for C#, the .NET programming language.
"This will be a great opportunity to build more bridges with Windows
developers and show them that there is an ECMA CLI (Common Language
Infrastructure) life in the other side of the OS spectrum," he writes
in his post, adding, "Looking forward to the group picture!"
A bit of a rant follows below...
Miguel de Icaza is (and really always has been) chasing rainbows. A quote:
"when we tell people the right applications which are not unique to
Windows that doesn’t particularly help Windows. And so we’ll continue
to see and do things that are standard-based because that’s important.
And you continue to see us encourage developers to do things that run
uniquely on the Windows platform. You know, with the new Silverlight,
you can build Silverlight applications that are flash-like in the
sense that they run across platform. But you can also do things which
are even nicer which really narrow down and run only on Windows. And
given that Windows is a billion units, you can afford to make
optimizations as long as they bring value and do your applications
that are Windows unique." -- Steve Ballmer
"Microsoft has had clear competitors in the past. It’s a good thing we
have museums to document that" -- Bill Gates
And this too:
"I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at
my expense -- I deserve it." -- Jean-Louis Gassée
(don't know him? He ran a company, Be, that made an OS called BeOS...
some pics: http://toastytech.com/guis/b5pe.html No, I didn't know
about them either until relatively recently ):
A bit of an aside, a quote from Scot Hacker, author of that article:
"So here we are in 2001, and guess what? It's still not possible to
purchase a dual-boot Win/Linux machine. Doesn't that seem kind of odd?
With all of the hype Linux has gotten, and with the technical
simplicity of shipping dual-boot machines, not a single PC OEM is
shipping such a beast. The technology marketplace is glutted with
options. Vendors use even the smallest opportunities to trumpet their
differentiating factors. Linux is free. And yet there are no
commercially available dual-boot machines on the market. Not one. The
silence of the marketplace speaks volumes. There is no other way to
explain this phenomenon other than as a repercussion of the
confidential Windows License under which every hardware vendor must do
...and realize that now it's 2010 and NOTHING has changed as far as
that's concerned; Linux has to try and claw its way onto machines
where it can, mostly used Windows systems for which the hardware was
And now getting back to Mono, realize that Microsoft controls the
show; that ultimately they will steer it in the direction they want
(to Windows sales) just as they have done with Microsoft Office
document formats that really only work perfectly in Microsoft Office.
If we follow that route, we will only ever be a 'Windows knock-off'.
We need to take a page from the ODF struggle and refuse to play the
game by Microsoft's rules. I really think that collectively we need
to say no to Mono just as much as if Microsoft wanted us to use Bing
as Ubuntu's default search engine.
(please do not scoff; when Microsoft got Linspire to do a 'patent
protection' deal, one of the results was that "Linspire will make
Microsoft's Live.com search engine the default Linspire 5.0 web search
Apparently Ballmer just had his 10th anniversary as Microsoft CEO; the
tactics may change somewhat, but realize that Microsoft is still not
(definitely NOT a Microsoft MVP ;)
More information about the sounder