And now for some vaguely on-topic off-topicality: OOo 3.2

[David Gerard]

On 17 February 2010 17:37, Chris Rees <utisoft at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 17 February 2010 17:27, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17 February 2010 17:25, Chris Rees <utisoft at googlemail.com> wrote:

>>> What Wikipedia _is_, though, is a fantastic place to steal a huge
>>> number of references related to the topic!

>> shhhh!

> Hehe, the advantage of being a teacher these days is I can recognise
> straight off the kind of stunts I used to pull off at school!


Wikipedia's incredibly dull, grey, reprocessed, caveat-laden house
style is also easy to spot a mile off when someone's
cutting'n'pasting.

And using it as a source for references is *excellent* stuff ... if
they remember to check the references say what they're claimed to say.
See previously concerning deserving what happens to them if they don't
;-)


- d.