And now for some vaguely on-topic off-topicality: OOo 3.2
dgerard at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 17:39:35 GMT 2010
On 17 February 2010 17:37, Chris Rees <utisoft at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 17 February 2010 17:27, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17 February 2010 17:25, Chris Rees <utisoft at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> What Wikipedia _is_, though, is a fantastic place to steal a huge
>>> number of references related to the topic!
> Hehe, the advantage of being a teacher these days is I can recognise
> straight off the kind of stunts I used to pull off at school!
Wikipedia's incredibly dull, grey, reprocessed, caveat-laden house
style is also easy to spot a mile off when someone's
And using it as a source for references is *excellent* stuff ... if
they remember to check the references say what they're claimed to say.
See previously concerning deserving what happens to them if they don't
More information about the sounder