Patently obvious

[Peter Davis]

On 11 August 2010 03:42, Cybe R. Wizard <cybe_r_wizard at earthlink.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:50:27 +0100
> Peter Davis <paddax at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > What do you think?
>
> Software is not an invention, it is a written work (of art (think,
> "book.")) and should fall under copyright, not patent law.
>
> Cybe R. Wizard
>
>
I fully aggree, software should not be patented, but there is a problem,
they already exist in there thousands**, even in countries that do not allow
software patents, they still exist.  Burying your head does not solve the
problem.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20100811/e4a65c84/attachment.htm