Ubuntu is now worried about profits

[Amedee Van Gasse (ub)]

On Sun, April 25, 2010 13:48, Manish Sinha wrote:
> On 4/25/2010 5:13 PM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Now if they can just bring the quality up to par as per the level of
>> testing that RHEL gets...oh wait, this is a 'community' OS. Good luck
>> Canonical. If I won't touch Fedora with a ten foot pole for servers
>> unless I have certain infrastructure in place to take some of the pain
>> away, I won't touch Ubuntu either even if it has the advantage of an
>> image-update that actually works and anaconda is way more flexible than
>> debian-installer at this moment. No, do not even talk about Ubuntu
>> installer.
>>
>
> The simplicity of Ubuntu installer is the + point for this distro.
> When I am trying to install a distro, I don't want to be asked whether I
> want to install SSH Daemon, then in next slide if I want to install LAMP
> stack and this keeps on going until I get fed up.
>
> Esp for servers, you need a bare-bone setup and then install packages as
> per your requirements.
>
> I know lack of customization can be a negative point for some people,
> but it is not a step backward.

I never use the recommended way to install Ubuntu. I use the Debian way.
Debootstrap. Yeah baby, mojolicious! ;-)