Some will argue the moon landings were faked

[Odd]

Michael Haney wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Amedee Van Gasse (Ubuntu)
> <amedee-ubuntu at amedee.be> wrote:
>> On Wed, September 30, 2009 14:29, David Gerard wrote:
>>> 2009/9/30 Amedee Van Gasse (Ubuntu) <amedee-ubuntu at amedee.be>:
>>>
>>>> Some argue that the reply should go back to where the email came from
>>>> _first_.
>>>
>>> Some will argue the moon landings were faked.
>> Those people are even more irritating than top-posters and html-ers. :-/
>>
>> I'm in discussion with one of those fools on http://lvb.net/item/7764
>> I shouldn't do it because he would drag me down to his level and beat me
>> with experience.
> 
> Second, I've heard the arguments of the Moon Landing Deniers and
> they're all full of it.  We now have photographic evidence of the moon
> landings from probes in lunar orbit

Yeah, but those nuts will probably claim that those are faked too..

> and now that its been proven 100%
> that there is Water (lots of it actually) on the moon we will
> definitely be going back ... this time to stay.

I bet China will be there first. :)

> The people who really grind my gears the most are the Holocaust
> Deniers.  I "knew" people who experienced the Holocaust, they still
> had the numbered tattoos on their arms!  There is overwhelming
> historical evidence that the Holocaust took place, we have reports
> from the allies who entered the camps, we have archival photos and
> film from the both the allies and the Nazis, there is all of the
> eyewitness accounts from the survivors, and many of the camps still
> exist today as historical monuments so we never forget the terrible
> tragedies that took place there.

I agree. Those are the ones that piss me off most too.

-- 
Odd