Microsoft wants you to "Get the Facts Straight"
Liam Proven
lproven at gmail.com
Wed Sep 9 15:30:48 BST 2009
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Fred Roller<froller at tnclimited.com> wrote:
> 3.1 (great because it was relief from cli, despite the constant crashes),
A relief from the CLI? I wasn't in any pain from it, myself. And what
of 3.0 or before?
> 95 (sucked like a vac),
A fine, good, solid release of Windows, a technological tour-de-force
that worked very well and led me to abandon my then-preferred PC OS,
OS/2.
> 98 (good release and a sigh of relief after 95),
Nasty bit of bloatware that caused endless problems. 98SE marginally
better but still crap.
> ME (didn't last 30 days on my system),
Still giving it to people occasionally. Fully patched, it's fine and
its Firewire support is the best of the whole 9x family.
> XP (same as 98, consumers were relieved that it worked),
What no 2000? XP is 2000 plus bloat, to me.
> Vista (disaster, thankfully gave linux a boost in the market to start
> being noticed),
Start? I think it was being noticed already. Still only 1-2% though.
> Window7 (I hear the sigh of relief echoing through the market now.)
From? Win7 is pretty but big and slow - it's not really any quicker
than Vista, as tests show, it just /feels/ quicker and PCs are faster
now than in 2007.
I just thought it was interesting how people's responses differ...
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508
More information about the sounder
mailing list