Discrimination based on OS?

[Fred Roller]

Samuel Thurston, III wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael <mmorse757 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> OS's.   If someone can not access resources due to a proprietary
>> protocol that can not be obtained without purchasing, then the user
>> definitely has a valid issue.
>>
>>     
>
> A valid issue without doubt, but still not discrimination.
>
> The only optional thing which is considered discrimination (in the
> U.S. at least) is religion, and I don't think we want to go so far as
> to classify Linux zealotry in this category.
>
>   
I agree about "Discrimination" may be too strong a word.  The spirit of 
the word was meant as "actively singling out".

-- 
Fred
www.fwrgallery.com

"Life is like linux, simple.  If you are fighting it you are doing something wrong."