Why sounder?

[Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing lists)]

On Thu, October 8, 2009 23:25, Samuel Thurston, III wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing
> lists) <amedee-ubuntu at amedee.be> wrote:
>> On Thu, October 8, 2009 18:20, Nils Kassube wrote:
>>> Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing lists) wrote:
>>>> On Thu, October 8, 2009 16:34, Nils Kassube wrote:
>>>> > Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing lists) wrote:
>>>> >> Why sounder? My question wasn't off topic...
>>>> >
>>>> > If you set a reply-to header for sounder, some folks will follow
>>>> > your desire. Didn't you have a similar problem before?
>>>>
>>>> That only proves that reply-to is broken and people should use
>>>> reply-to-list. It's their problem, not my problem. I was just
>>>> curious.
>>>
>>> But why do you set a reply-to header in the first place? And why a
>>> reply-to sounder if you send a message to ubuntu-users? If your mailer
>>> can't work without adding a reply-to header, can't you at least use
>>> individual addresses for each list? I mean, it is not a real problem
>>> but
>>> at least a bit confusing.
>>
>> I am already doing that.
>
> Is this the part where I do the "I told you so" dance?

Sebiet no koffiekoeken for you! :-p