mail to individuals

[Christopher Chan]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 05:03:49PM +0200, Odd wrote:
> Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:07:06 +0200 Odd <iodine at runbox.no> wrote:
> > 
> >> Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:09:09 -0400 Michael Haney
> >>> <thezorch at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> First of all, that's an unreasonable request.
> >>> If it an unreasonable request to ask that you at least /try/ 
> >>> something new and different then we really have no common ground
> >>> at all.
> >> It may be unreasonable to many, since the issue at hand can be 
> >> fixed by the list admin in one minute by adding a Reply-To: header.
> >> Migrating to another client will take far more time for one person,
> >> let alone x number of people.
> >> 
> > And have /you/ read: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html 
> > and http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html ? If
> > so, how can you still advocate non-compliance?
> 
> The first link talks about 'reasonable mail programs'.
> I disagree with his definition of a 'reasonable mail program'.
> Like I said before, why would you think your argument gains
> any more weight just because it's uttered on a web page
> instead of here?
> 

Oi! No thunderbird on Windows allowed. In fact, you should post from an Ubuntu box. ssh into your box and use mutt just like 
everybody else on sounder.