mail to individuals
iodine at runbox.no
Thu Oct 1 15:10:04 BST 2009
Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 13:09 +0200, Odd wrote:
>> Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 23:51 -0500, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>>>> I say that at least Claws mail works correctly, others have said that
>>>> their clients work correctly. If it is the list that is broken how is
>>>> it possible that some clients work and others do not?
>>>> That is my only claim; that since some mailer proggies do and some do
>>>> not, it is the proggies, not the list config, that is at fault.
>>> I agree, any list munging the Reply-To header is broken; being tired
>>> of stating things over and over again, have a look at Chip Rosenthal's
>> How does one person stating your exact arguments on a webpage
>> change anything? He's just as wrong as you..
>>> btw, on most lists I'm subscribed to that munge Reply-To a majority uses
>>> Thunderbird. Does this observation tell something about brokeness ?
>> Yes, that most people disagree with you.
> Your terseness and logic are like your pseudonym: odd.
> nugh said, the CoC forbids me to write what I'd like to.
> ps: for your convenience, I manually add a Reply-To header.
Thanks! But do feel free to ignore the CoC. This is the off-topic
list, after all. You certainly won't hurt my feelings, no matter
what you come up with, I assure you.
More information about the sounder