mail to individuals

[Odd]

Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 13:09 +0200, Odd wrote:
>> Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 23:51 -0500, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>>>
>>>> I say that at least Claws mail works correctly, others have said that
>>>> their clients work correctly.  If it is the list that is broken how is
>>>> it possible that some clients work and others do not?  
>>>>
>>>> That is my only claim; that since some mailer proggies do and some do
>>>> not, it is the proggies, not the list config, that is at fault.
>>> I agree, any list munging the Reply-To header is broken; being tired
>>> of stating things over and over again, have a look at Chip Rosenthal's
>>>
>>>    http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>> How does one person stating your exact arguments on a webpage
>> change anything? He's just as wrong as you..
>>
>>> btw, on most lists I'm subscribed to that munge Reply-To a majority uses
>>> Thunderbird.  Does this observation tell something about brokeness ?
>> Yes, that most people disagree with you.
>>
>> -- 
>> Odd
> 
> Your terseness and logic are like your pseudonym: odd.

Hehe. :)

> nugh said, the CoC forbids me to write what I'd like to.
>   Siggy
> 
> ps: for your convenience, I manually add a Reply-To header.

Thanks! But do feel free to ignore the CoC. This is the off-topic
list, after all. You certainly won't hurt my feelings, no matter
what you come up with, I assure you.

-- 
Odd