Community V. "Community

[Christopher Chan]

Mario Vukelic wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 08:33 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>   
>> More like he was ignored by the 'Community' while a member of the 
>> 'Community' came up with something similar.
>> After all, how could they let a user transform into a 'to be taken 
>> seriously developer' who had zero developer background.
>>
>> But hey, you could say he finally got the 'Community' to 'listen'.
>>
>> Who wants to try next?
>>     
>
>
> It can be argued that desktop performance does not pay the bills for the
> kernel, server performance does. 
>
>
>   


Heh, guess why I put in my remark about paying for coding to be done in 
my previous post?

However, how are you going to argue that one in the case of Con who is a 
user that contributed working code? He did it on his own 'pocket' and I 
don't remember there being any complaints about his scheduler adversely 
affecting 'server performance'. Otherwise, by your reasoning, CFS would 
never had happened.


Amber got it right, there is Community and then there is 'Community'.