A modest proposal. (Was: An Open Letter to the Open Source Community)

[Chris Puttick]

I'm with Michael. We should probably agree to disagree on the bits we
disagree on and agree to the rest ;).

I'd go with vi(m).

I also like to propose the subjects of "why is there no iSCSI support
in LTS server?" and "does the Ubuntu community have a position on ODF
v. OOXML?"

Chris

On 25/05/07, sounder-request at lists.ubuntu.com
<sounder-request at lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:23:43 +0800
> From: "Michael T. Richter" <ttmrichter at gmail.com>
> Subject: A modest proposal.  (Was: An Open Letter to the Open Source
>         Community)
> To: Tristan Wibberley <maihem at maihem.org>
> Cc: The Sounder <sounder at lists.ubuntu.com>, Micah Cowan
>         <micahcowan at ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <1180056223.15495.1.camel at localhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Fri, 2007-25-05 at 01:06 +0100, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
>
> TL;DR
>
> Could we please move on from this subject to something slightly less
> inflammatory?  I modestly propose that we discuss which of emacs or vi
> should be the default Ubuntu editor myself.
>
> --
> Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter at gmail.com> (GoogleTalk:
> ttmrichter at gmail.com)
> There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make
> it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way
> is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
> (Charles Hoare)


-- 
My employers website: http://thehumanjourney.net - opinions in this
email are however very much my own and may not reflect that of my
current employer, past employers, associates, friends, family, pets etc..