A modest proposal. (Was: An Open Letter to the Open Source Community)

Fri May 25 02:23:43 BST 2007

On Fri, 2007-25-05 at 01:06 +0100, Tristan Wibberley wrote:

TL;DR

Could we please move on from this subject to something slightly less
inflammatory?  I modestly propose that we discuss which of emacs or vi
should be the default Ubuntu editor myself.

-- 
Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter at gmail.com> (GoogleTalk:
ttmrichter at gmail.com)
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make
it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way
is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
(Charles Hoare)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20070525/e29815aa/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20070525/e29815aa/attachment.pgp 